Options Backtest Fills: Mid vs Halfway vs Bid/Ask, Tested | FlashAlpha
research · 1 min read

What Fills Do to an Options Backtest: Mid, Halfway and Bid/Ask on 1.35 Million Trades, 2018 to 2026

We repriced 1.35 million short-premium trades on 11 ETFs and stocks from 2018 to 2026 at five fill levels, measured what the quoted spread and a one-cent slip cost each design, and tested three fill habits with a plan written before the results.

Research Enterprise Backtesting Fills Slippage OptionSelling Execution

Most option backtests assume a fill at the midpoint. We repriced 1.35 million short-premium trades on 11 ETFs and stocks, 2018 to 2026, at five fill levels from mid to bid/ask. On SPY, QQQ and IWM, 62% of 360 designs made money at mid and 44% at halfway fills (a quarter of the quoted spread away from mid, plus one cent per share). The order of the designs barely changed (rank correlation 0.93); whether they made money did. We also tested three fill habits, with the plan written before the results. None of the three held up under a like-for-like comparison.

Enterprise members

This section is for Enterprise members

Enterprise members get the full study: the spread cost map by symbol, delta and expiry, Sharpe ratios at five fill levels for 1,153 designs, three tests of fill habits planned before the results, and a script that measures the fill cost of your own design.

Live Market Pulse

Get fast visibility into market shifts with full-chain analytics over low-latency REST and MCP polling.

Intelligent Screening

Screen millions of option pairs per second using your custom EV rules, filters, and setups.

Export-Ready

Export structured signals to your own execution stack or broker integration - FlashAlpha delivers the analytics, you keep control of order routing.

Join the Community

Discord

Engage in real time conversations with us!

Twitter / X

Follow us for real-time updates and insights!

GitHub

Explore our open-source SDK, examples, and analytics resources!