Help us double down on what's working, instead of guessing. Takes 5 seconds, totally optional.
research · 1 min read
What Fills Do to an Options Backtest: Mid, Halfway and Bid/Ask on 1.35 Million Trades, 2018 to 2026
We repriced 1.35 million short-premium trades on 11 ETFs and stocks from 2018 to 2026 at five fill levels, measured what the quoted spread and a one-cent slip cost each design, and tested three fill habits with a plan written before the results.
Most option backtests assume a fill at the midpoint. We repriced 1.35 million short-premium trades on 11 ETFs and stocks, 2018 to 2026, at five fill levels from mid to bid/ask. On SPY, QQQ and IWM, 62% of 360 designs made money at mid and 44% at halfway fills (a quarter of the quoted spread away from mid, plus one cent per share). The order of the designs barely changed (rank correlation 0.93); whether they made money did. We also tested three fill habits, with the plan written before the results. None of the three held up under a like-for-like comparison.
Enterprise members
This section is for Enterprise members
Enterprise members get the full study: the spread cost map by symbol, delta and expiry, Sharpe ratios at five fill levels for 1,153 designs, three tests of fill habits planned before the results, and a script that measures the fill cost of your own design.